Entries Tagged as 'Current Events'

It’s not a cracker…

At first glance, comments made by Paul Myers are way worse than what the Florida college student did. I’m not sure why Professor Myers even felt compelled to respond, especially with such cruel comments against Christians.

“Can anyone out there score me some consecrated communion wafers? … I’ll show you sacrilege, gladly, and with much fanfare. I won’t be tempted to hold it hostage … but will instead treat it with profound disrespect and heinous cracker abuse, all photographed and presented here on the web. I shall do so joyfully and with laughter in my heart.”

It is hard to think of anything more vile than to intentionally desecrate the Body of Christ,” Catholic League President Bill Donohue said in a news release. “We look to those who have oversight responsibility to act quickly and decisively.” Mpls StarTribune

Sister Souljah moment?

This morning, I heard a strange phrase on the top of the hour news from the ABC Radio News that left me wondering: what in the world is a Sister Souljah moment? I googled it and learned that it is a phrase that dates back to 1992. Where have I been? Actually, I remember the Clinton years - I turned off the radio and television for 8 years until he was no longer our president.

Good use of public money or not?

The other night, my son wanted me to pick him up from a friend’s house. It was one of those winding and confusing townhome developments and I couldn’t find any house numbers. He cheerfully offered to just run over to the nearby park. It was 10pm and very dark. I shouted “No!” into my cell phone. Didn’t he realize who hung out in that park at night? Thankfully, he really wasn’t aware of that side of night life and I’m glad we had an opportunity to discuss it on the way home.
This morning, Ian and Margery Punnett discussed their recent daytime stop at a local park. Their discussion led to a mention of Mara Gottfried’s recent article on sex in public parks highlights many disturbing things, least of which involves homosexuality. This sentence from the article has stuck in my brain this morning:

“…her perception is that law enforcement’s attempt to crack down on men cruising for sex “waxes and wanes with public outrage.”

Can I interpret that statement as police crack down on certain crimes based on how much citizens complain about particular laws being broken? What is wrong with that? The radio discussion this morning led to questioning of whether the police are wasting public dollars. I think that it would be wasting public dollars to NOT keep the park usable by all for public activities. I wonder if Mara Gottfried could find no one else to make an argument against the sting operation. Her idea that public outrage is somehow not valid surprises me.

An excerpt from the article:

The man was watching a pornographic video in his minivan in a St. Paul park. He turned the portable screen so an undercover police officer, sitting in a car next to him, could see it and invited him into the van.

When the officer got in, the man exposed himself, the officer said.

The officer quietly told the 48-year-old he was under arrest and walked him to a nearby vehicle, where officer Heather Weyker was waiting to take down his pertinent information and get a mug shot.

“You can’t do this kind of stuff in the parks,” she told the man. “This is inexcusable for the people who want to use the parks to walk their dogs and hang out with their kids and they can’t.”

The man was one of four arrested by St. Paul police for indecent exposure Wednesday in Crosby Farm Regional Park, off Shepard Road. In the past six weeks, police have arrested about 40 others for similar activity in this park and another on Meeker Island, said Sgt. Steve Anderson.

The stings have been driven by complaints about men engaging in public sex and lewd conduct in both parks, police say.

Police are taking a multipronged approach: They’re working with prosecutors, suggesting that perpetrators who are convicted and sentenced to community service be assigned to parks to clean up trash, Anderson said. Condom wrappers and other debris are a big problem, police say.

Shrubbery recently was cut back on Meeker Island in the Desnoyer Park neighborhood to allow fewer places to hide, Anderson said. Signs warning that the park is under surveillance and that no loitering or lewd conduct is permitted were posted on Meeker Island and in Crosby Park years ago, but new ones have been put up on Meeker Island, Anderson said.

Critics said the sting operations are unfair.

“We often downplay or pay little attention to indiscretions between males and females who engage in sexual encounters in public - be it in the back seat of a car, in the back of a bar, in a unisex restroom - and then sensationalize any cases that involve same-gender contact,” said Lorraine Teel, executive director of the Minnesota AIDS Project.

Teel said there’s a double standard and her perception is that law enforcement’s attempt to crack down on men cruising for sex “waxes and wanes with public outrage.”

[Read more →]

Scandal hits wife-carrying contest…

The St. Hilaire’s didn’t win, but competed in style.

Wife-carrying contest
By a margin of only a third of a second, a Boston couple claimed victory at the 8th annual North American Wife Carrying Championships held Saturday at Sunday River Ski Resort.

“We could never expect something this good,” said Keith Cardoza after successfully bringing Julia Stoner, his girlfriend of six months, through the 253.3 meter course.

For the victory, Cardoza and Stoner may receive $1,000 toward a trip to attend the World Wife Carrying Championships in Finland. The couple were also awarded a check for $675 (five times Stoner’s weight) and Stoner’s weight in beer. The latter amounted to nine twelve-pack cases.

OK, so there’s no scandal, but here’s my questions. First of all, how can the winners NOT be married? If it’s a wife-carrying contest, then you must carry a wife. I guess the rules have changed over the centuries. The official rules say, The wife to be carried may be your own, the neighbour’s or you may have found her farther afield; she must, however, be over 17 years of age. NO mention of a girlfriend.

Secondly, what beer did they receive as a prize? Would you compete for nine cases of Miller Lite? Probably not. Would you compete for nine cases of Moose Drool? More likely.

Thoughts on Marian Jones…

I am still looking for an explanation of how the court appearances for the check fraud and the lying about the drugs came to be on the same day. Are they connected? In my mind, the emotional nature of going to court for either one would be huge and for both would be even bigger.

This story is a good illustration for Christians of how we are all hypocrites in that we remain both saint and sinner on this earth.

Another thought is why should she retire from the sport?

“I have asked Almighty God for forgiveness . . . because of my actions, I am retiring from the sport of track and field, a sport that I deeply love,

Sounds like she is playing God by setting up a severe consequence for herself. Is she assuming that is what God wants her to do? Or is she trying to garner sympathy by her self-imposed ban from the sport. I find her statement of retirement intriguing and revealing. Her action is something most of us do, of course, but it doesn’t make it the right consequence.

If God has given you gifts in a particular area, should you ban yourself from it when you fail or make a mistake? If you were a doctor, the answer might be yes. But how will it hurt anyone for her to stay actively involved in sports? The potential to help others might be greater. Granted her “mistakes” were quite large and occurred over a long time, but surely she was NOT born with “feet of clay”. I assume she showed promise as an athlete long before anyone introduced drugs to her. I would think the harder (and more humbling) road would be for her to continue as an athlete and have to face accusers every day. Of course, the natural consequence of her actions is that she probably would be banned from many events anyway. But it seems to me that for her to continue in her sport in whatever way is allowed would allow her to use her God-given talents and be a positive example for the many who are still tempted by performance-enhancing drugs.

Hat tip to Mollie Heminway’s discussion of this story at Get Religion.

When will God call on you?

When you wake up each day, you never really know what the day will bring? My brother-in-law, Jay, learned today that sometimes you don’t even get to wake up on your own to find out how God could use you.

First, watch this video clip.

Jay woke up at 5 am to flashing red lights. The Mississippi River, which is usually 1/2 mile away from his house, was at the door. The sheriff told him to evacuate the house. Jay went next door and woke up his 73 year old neighbor and her six grandchildren who were sleeping in her basement. Jay helped them climb a ladder to her roof where they were supposed to wait for help. Jay then rescued two dogs. While he and the woman, the six children and the two dogs waited on a roof, the woman’s basement collapsed…the same basement the six children had just been sleeping in. When they were rescued, they were taken by ambulance to the Red Cross shelter. Jay said that all he owns in his basement apartment he rents is under 9 feet of water. I told him that it was all replaceable, but that he wasn’t! He is staying tonight at a friend’s house high up in the city. I’m pretty proud of him tonight. God obviously used him in a very special way this morning.

It really was a beautiful bridge…

On a beautiful day last fall, Norman of Norman’s Demense took this stunning photo of the underside of the 35W bridge over the Mississippi River. It’s sheer size fools the eye. You are looking at the underside of a 6-lane freeway which stands seven stories above the river.

As bridge failed, so did phone network

For the past couple of weeks, my husband has been talking about dropping our land line phone. It costs over $300.00 a year for basic phone service. Our home phone rarely rings. We each have our our phone and direct most calls to those phones. So why pay for a land line? For the past two weeks, we literally have been keeping track of incoming phone calls and any reason to keep the land line. This past Wednesday night brought a pretty good reason to keep our land line: in the midst of the bridge disaster, our cell phones failed. They worked here and there, but calls dropped frequently. Also, contact with our out-state relatives (who were just sure they saw my car on that bridge) was impossible for a few hours. Radio and television announcers begged people to stay off their cell phones and use their land lines instead so that emergency workers could communicate with each other.

I’ve been waited to see this story covered by local reporters, but they are too busy covering other important aspects of this disaster. The Chicago Tribune, however, featured an excellent story on the Minneapolis cell phone failure of 8-1-2007. Jon Van writes, in As Bridge Failed, So Did Phone Network:

Cell phone networks have technology that enables them to give priority to people dialing 911 and to authorized emergency personnel, but no network can handle every call when traffic spikes at levels two or three times beyond normal, said David Chamberlain, principal wireless analyst for In-Stat, a market research firm.

“The public should just expect” cell phone calls to be blocked, he said. “It’s going to happen. If I’m ever in a situation where my calls don’t go through, I’ll just send a text message. That will get through.”

Because text messages require little network capacity and travel on separate channels from voice calls, they are always the preferred mode to assure a loved one that someone near a disaster is unharmed, said Sprint’s DeVries.

While virtually all cell phones support text messaging and young people typically use it more than voice calling, it is utterly foreign to many older customers, he said.

“After the Virginia Tech tragedy, we suggested that it would be wise for parents with youngsters in college to learn to text message in case they needed to communicate in some kind of situation like that,” DeVries said.

All cell carriers said that calling volumes declined enough to support normal service within a few hours after the bridge collapse occurred. The task now is to monitor changes in calling patterns in the Twin Cities due to a major thoroughfare being closed.

Is this Minnesota’s worst disaster?

Is the collapse of the 35W bridge the worst disaster in the history of Minnesota? I feels like it now, but what does history tell us? Ian Punnett posed that question this morning and here are some listener responses:

1918 Cloquet fire
Armistice Day blizzard

St. Peter tornado

Washburn Mill explosion

Reno plane crash

Hibbing plane crash

Wellstone death

Duluth lynchings

As bad as the bridge collapse is, the Anoka tornadoes of May 1965 have it beat. Growing up here, I heard stories over and over of the terrible tornadoes in 1965. Once in a while, my parents would point out something that had been damaged by those tornadoes, which affected more than just Anoka apparently. I think those tornadoes still hold the “record” for death and destruction. Here’s a little info:

The May 6, 1965 Tornadoes

The worst tornadoes in Twin Cities history occurred forty-two years ago, with five tornadoes sweeping across the western and northern portions of the 7-county region, and a sixth tornado just outside the metropolitan area. Four tornadoes were rated F4, one was an F3, and the other produced F2 damage. Thirteen people were killed and 683 injured. Many more would have been killed had it not been for the warnings of the U.S. Weather Bureau, local officials, and the
outstanding communications by local radio and television stations. Many credit the announcers of WCCO-AM with saving countless lives. It was also the first time in Twin Cities history that civil defense sirens were used for severe weather.

There were two photographs of tornadoes - the Deephaven tornado and the second Fridley tornado were both published in the Minneapolis Tribune. It is unknown whether anybody else took pictures of any of the tornadoes that day.

Who is to blame for a bridge collapsing?

Click on the photo above for a larger shot
Who is to blame for a bridge collapsing? I’ve been reading comments from citizens who are quick to blame “government” or President Bush or the conservatives, etc. Who is to blame? Each citizen who is capable of independent thought and action is to blame. “Government” is you and me. If I choose to travel a bridge each day, I am doing so because I have decided to trust that it has been inspected by someone. Who is that someone? It’s my neighbor, in a broad sense…a fellow citizen. I can’t blame bridge failure on a big brother government. I blame myself for not reviewing the bridge inspection reports myself and contacting my legislators.

Consider the following:

“Perhaps the bill passed last fall, giving almost 1/2 of MNDOT funding to lightrail needs to be rethought!”, says one MNSpeaker.
I’m not against light rail. I believe it is good for future generations, but did it come at the expense of funding for existing transportation upkeep?
Excerpt From:(pg.32)http://www.budget.state.mn.us/budget/gov_spending_overview.pdf
“The bonding bill passed in 2006 included a number of transportation projects, including:
” $71 million for Local Bridges and Local Roads
” $60 million to complete state funding for Northstar Commuter rail line
” $12 million for other rail and transit projects and programs, and for land acquisition at St Cloud airport
” Funding for planning or design of a number of transitways: I-35 Bus Rapid Transit, Cedar Avenue Busway, Central Corridor, Red Rock Corridor, Robert Street Corridor, and Union Depot.”