Entries Tagged as ''

What’s new in Amsterdam today?

From MSNBC.com: Protestors from a religious group called “Cry for Life” , from left, Johannes Vleggeert, Bert Doorenbos and Alex van Vuuren pray outside Dutch government buildings in The Hague earlier this year. Sign on the table reads: “human considers, God decides”.

AMSTERDAM - The Dutch government intends to expand its current euthanasia policy, setting guidelines for when doctors may end the lives of terminally ill newborns with the parents’ consent. Read on…

Further commentary and more strange Dutch tales (yep…polygamy) from Pastor Paul McCain.

hat tip to Bunnie Diehl

Bill Bennett

I have listened to the phone call in question and, when heard in context, the comments are not troubling. I think his choice of words was based on his experience in studying the issue of crime in predominantly black communities. I base that on his own statement from his follow-up interview on Hannity and Colmes:

HANNITY: And I’m glad to hear you say what you said here. I want you to respond to those democrats that are grandstanding, the same ones that had Robert Bird, the former Klansman as their leader. The ones that didn’t speak out about Congressman Wrangle’s Bull Connor remark.

BENNETT: Yeah. Yeah. Well, let’s see, you got Kennedy. I will — I’ll not take instruction from Teddy Kennedy. A young woman likely drowned because of his negligence. I’ll take no moral instruction with him. That’s much worse than legal gambling what Teddy Kennedy did. He should make no judgments at all about people. He shouldn’t be in the Senate. As far as racist and all this other stuff, I’ll put my record up with Howard Dean, with Harry Reid.

When I was drug czar, you bet, we were working on the issue of black crime, Alan and Sean, because there was a lot of crime in the black community. And you know who most of the victims are? Their black people. Yeah, black violence — black-on-black violence is very serious. I went to about 120 inner city communities. That’s where the senate wanted me to go, that’s where the Senate wanted me to go, that’s where I wanted to go. We went after public housing and we went after the bad guys. And you know what? We got the bad guys. And drug use went down. And we raised the price and lowered the purity of cocaine. And we arrested four of the most powerful drug dealers in the world. And got a lot of these guys off the street. And I am very proud of that. Because when we went into the inner city black community, the people said to me, Mr. Czar, or Czar, or Mr. Benet, you get those people off the street and protect us. And we did our best to do it.

Before that, when I was secretary of education, I took on what I think is one of the great civil rights issues of our time, which is educational opportunity and educational choice. The stupid ghettoized curriculum we have, the fact that these black kids go to lousy schools and aren’t allowed to choose the schools of their choice because they don’t have the money and don’t have the opportunity.

I’ve been at this for 25 years and I have been called everything in the book, but I will stay at what I do because I believe it.

I am disappointed in the White House comments on the matter:

“The president believes the comments were not appropriate,” White House press secretary Scott McClellan said.

You can also see Bennett’s comments taken out of context and spun hard on Media Matter.org:

Addressing a caller’s suggestion that the “lost revenue from the people who have been aborted in the last 30 years” would be enough to preserve Social Security’s solvency, radio host and former Reagan administration Secretary of Education Bill Bennett dismissed such “far-reaching, extensive extrapolations” by declaring that if “you wanted to reduce crime … if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down.” Bennett conceded that aborting all African-American babies “would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do,” then added again, “but the crime rate would go down.”

Art Garfunkel update

Art Garfunkel’s son, James, and wife, Kim Cermak Garfunkel

One of my favorite singers, Art Garfunkel, was in the news again recently for another marijuana possession charge back in August 2005. Here’s what happened:

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Singer Art Garfunkel, who pleaded guilty to marijuana possession last year, has been arrested again on the same charge. Garfunkel, 63, half of the legendary ’60s duo Simon and Garfunkel, was pulled over on Sunday by a New York state trooper near Woodstock after running a stop sign, The Daily Freeman newspaper reported on Tuesday. The trooper’s report of the incident said a strong marijuana odor was coming from the car and a marijuana cigarette was found in the ashtray. Garfunkel, who lives in New York City, was given a ticket and is due to appear in Woodstock Town Court on September 22. In January 2004, Garfunkel was charged with unlawful possession of marijuana after state police from the same barracks stopped his car for speeding. He subsequently pleaded guilty and paid a $100 fine and a $100 state surcharge. Garfunkel’s hits with Paul Simon include “Bridge Over Troubled Water,” “The Sound of Silence” and “Scarborough Fair.”

So he was just drivin’ along down the highway, tokin’ away and gets caught. This after getting busted doing the same thing eight months earlier. I think he should be the poster child for pot smokers - an incredibly talented man who still cannot shake his marijuana addiction at the age of 63. Embarrassing, to say the least; dangerous at best.

I had the opportunity to look at his own website today while looking for the lyrics to one of my favorite songs, Always Look on the Bright Side of Life (the version sung by Art). I bought the soundtrack to As Good As it Gets in order to listen to Art’s version of that song, but the entire soundtrack ended up being wonderful.

From Art’s website, I learned that:

Paul Simon and Art Garfunkel performed together at Madison Square Garden on September 20th in “From The Big Apple to The Big Easy,” a concert for long term relief and rebuilding in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. The duo sang Bridge Over Troubled Water, Homeward Bound and Mrs. Robinson. Wouldn’t it have been wonderful to hear them sing those songs live? Here are two reviews of their appearance at the fundraiser:

Rolling Stone Magazine:


“Simon and Garfunkel, one of the final acts at the Garden, were introduced by actor Paul Newman. “As tonight proves, music has a power all its own,” he said. “In our most trying times, music has a healing power like a bridge over troubled water.” Minutes later, Garfunkel and Aaron Neville traded verses on the aforementioned tune. “As many times as I’ve sung that song, I don’t think it’s ever meant as much to me as it does tonight,” said Garfunkel. “

New York Post:


“Even with all the Big Easy talent at Madison Square Garden singing to rebuild their homes and lives in the wake of the Hurricane Katrina, it was two Queens boys, grown old, who best captured the spirit of the night. Last night, emotions ran high and a spirit of giving flooded the Garden when New York treasures Paul Simon and Art Garfunkel reprised their incredibly apropos classic “Bridge Over Troubled Water”.


My one thought is what Art’s teenage son, James, thinks about his dad’s arrests. Even in the most progressive family, this would have to take a toll on a teenager.

My plan is on hold…

Thursday Morning after powerball drawing update:

I only got one number right on my Powerball ticket and the price of gas went up by ten cents a gallon. Yet another example of why I’ve never been to a casino and don’t plan to. On the bright side (always look on the bright side of life), my dear father-in-law has located a 1999 Dodge Neon for my daughter (who will have her license in six months). I plan on driving that for carpool and errands around town, which should save me at least $100 a month. So, things always work out somehow.

On the way home from my son’s hockey practice tonight, he and I stopped at Holiday to get some gas. I decided on only a half a tank because I just didn’t feel like dropping 70 bucks tonight. Instead, I decided to gamble that the price of gas would continue to go down. When Erik and I went in to buy some OJ for tomorrow morning (and Fruity Pebbles and Cocoa Pebbles), I remembered that the Powerball was up to something like 148 million tonight. I decided to buy two tickets. I only buy lottery tickets when it gets this high, which is ridiculous I know, but its the only time I buy a ticket. On the way home, Erik started asking me all sorts of questions regarding the things I’d buy if I won. It surprised me the detailed list I was able to produce in a short time:

  • Buy an Audi A6, loaded, and not worry about the cost of maintainence
  • Buy houses for all the grandparents, other family members and one special sis-in-law
  • College funds for everyone
  • Money for grandparents so they don’t HAVE to work
  • Money for church, charities
  • Some new clothes
  • House nearby in nice woodsy area - not Cedar Pass, but Sherwood Forest

Then we started talking about all the things that wouldn’t change:

  • Still have to try out for sports teams in high school and college
  • Still have to pass your classes
  • Still want to attend same schools
  • Still careful with money and not wasteful

And I reminded him of the problems we would have:

  • Would never really know if a person liked you for yourself
  • Have to hire accountant and lawyer
  • Would get lots of requests from money from everyone and it would be hard to deal with
  • Lots of extra worries and headaches from managing the money wisely

I am glad Erik and I had this disucussion. I was surprised at the detailed plans I held in my head for possible lottery winning. Despite all the problems, I am up for the challenge!

Babs’ short memory

I read this very funny post Sunday on Drudge:

“We are in a global warming emergency state, and these storms are going to become more frequent, more intense,” Streisand urgently declares.

But Sawyer did not remind Streisand that a Category 5 hurricane struck the Bahamas with 160 mph winds — when the singer was five years old, in 1947!

And when Streisand was 8 years old, a Cat 5 hurricane — named “Dog” — packing 185 mph churned-away in the Atlantic.

When she was 9, a Cat 5 storm named “Easy” ripped the seas with 160 mph sustained winds. Streisand was 13 years old when “Janet” hit Mexico with 150 mph winds.

Streisand was celebrating her sweet sixteen as “Cleo” formed with 140 mph.

At 18, Streisand read news about “Donna” AND “Ethel” — both storms carried 140 mph winds and formed 9 days apart in 1960!

One year later, when Streisand was 19, it happened again: Two Category 5 storms scared the world: “Carla” and “Hattie!” “Carla” maxed out at 175 mph winds the year Streisand made her television debut on “The Jack Paar Show.”

And who could forget Hurricane “Camille” — which smashed into the United States with 190 mph, just as “Funny Girl” garners eight Academy Award nominations, including one for Best Picture and one for Barbra as Best Actress.

Thanks to Anti-Strib for a nice summary and commentary on Hurricane Agnes:Anti-Strib

Living Among Mysteries: The Great Books of the Western World and Library Thing

From Jeremy at Living Among Mysteries comes two fun tools for book-lovers:

1. Ten Year Reading Plan: The Great Books of the Western World

2. Library Thing: My Library

There I am…right over Reagan’s heart…

You are a Social Conservative (38% permissive)

and an Economic Conservative (61% permissive)

You are best described as a: Centrist

You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness.

I was happy with my results until that last line. I think one misstated answer did that. It’s not that I don’t believe in economic fairness; I fear how it would be carried out. Economic fairness can only happen through a judge of fairness which would be dependent on a definition of fairness.

Take the politics test. I’m willing to bet it was written by a self-pronounced “centrist” who leans left. Hat tip to Vicar Lehmann.

Boston Globe’s Top 50 Science Fiction TV Shows

My second favorite show, Earth: Final Conflict

If you are reading blogs tonight, I KNOW you have watched and enjoyed at least one of these shows. It’s just a given - blogs, computers, science fiction… Face it!

50. “Earth Final Conflict” - This one would be near the top of the list for me. This show, in its first season, was absolutely fantastic. It went downhill from their, probably due to a change in writers.

49. “The Wild Wild West” — My hubby loved this show. I remember it, but wasn’t interested in it at the time.

48. “Third Rock from the Sun” — Funny, but I never really “got” that show.

47. “Buck Rogers in the 25th Century”

46. “That was Then”

45. “The Greatest American Hero”

44. “Lois and Clark: The New Adventures of Superman”

43. “Nowhere Man”

42. “Science Fiction Theater”

41. “Futurama”

40. “The Thunderbirds”

39. “The man from U.N.C.L.E”

38. “Batman” — I watched this show everyday after school.

37. “Space 1999″

36. “The Bionic Woman” — OK, I confess; I liked this show.

35. “Battlestar Galactica”

34. “The Avengers”

33. “Lost in Space” — Loved it. Saw every episode. Actually felt afraid during the “scary” parts.

32. “My Favorite Martian”

31. “Alien Nation” - Fantastic movie, stupid show.

30. “Voyage to the Bottom of the Seas”

29. “Six Million Dollar Man” - every kid my age watched this show.

28. “Adventures of Superman”

27. “Buffy the Vampire Slayer”

26. “Stargate Atlantis”

25. “The Jetsons” - Loved this cartoon!!!

24. “Wonder Woman” — Watched it, liked it.

23. “Tales from the Crypt”

22. “Andromeda”

21. “Quantum Leap”

20. “The Hitchhiker”

19. “Dark Angel”

18. “V” — Loved the mini-series. Was it a show, too? Still can’t get some of the grosser images out of my mind. I freaked out for months after that guy froze and smashed his arm.

17. “Firefly”

16. “Flash Gordon”

15. “Logan’s Run”

14. “Star Trek: Voyager”

13. “Outer Limits”

12. Xena: Warrier Princess”

11. “Lost”

10. “Sliders”

9. “Mystery Science Fiction Theater”

8. “Dr. Who” — I liked this show, but my parents wouldn’t let me watch it.

7. “The Twilight Zone” — Wonderful

6. “Stargate SG-1″ —Loved the movie only

5. “Babylon 5″

4. “X Files” — Couldn’t watch much…had young children

3. “Star Trek the Next Generation” —Seen every episode at least 3 to 5 times.

2. “Battlestar Galactica” —

1. “Star Trek, the original” - Best show ever created. Period. Influenced generations to come.

Hat tip to Sandy from the M.A.W.B. ala Boston Globe.

New blog-keeper quiz…

This one is circulating the M.O.B. circuit. It’s pretty funny. I deleted the stupid/offensive questions. I tag Lutheran college student Brian Braatz of NonPareil, eternally newly weds Suzi from Swansmith and Tim from Blobjects by Timman, and Wisconsin neighbor, Mary-Eileen from Stand in the Trenches.

1. Do you try to look nice when you go to the grocery store just in case someone recognizes you from your blog?

Being part of the Minnesota Organization of Bloggers (M.O.B.), the thought of meeting a fellow blogger does cross my mind once in a while. However, my thought is usually that I would be standing next to a fellow MOBster at Target Ridgedale and never even know it. I could show up at Keegan’s for trivia and then I would know what people looked like. My goal these days is not to look revolting or embarrassing; hot is not even on my list.

As far as my Confessional Lutheran brethren, I’m thinking that I will meet most of them one day…one way or another.

2. Are the photos you post Photoshopped or otherwise altered?

Not that I am aware of…

3. Do you like it when creeps or dorks email you?

Thankfully, this doesn’t happen to me…yet.

4. Do you lie in your blog?

Haven’t needed to yet.

5. Are you passive-aggressive in your blog?

No, I hate passive-aggressivity.

6. Do you ever threaten to quit writing so people will tell you not to stop?

I wouldn’t be so presumptuous as to think I would get a barrage of replies.

7. Are you in therapy? If not, should you be? If so, is it helping?

No, should I be?

8. Do you delete mean comments? Do you fake nice ones?

I have deleted spam. Don’t need to fake nice comments; I’d give myself a nice comment if I felt I needed it and I’d sign my own name to it!

10. If your readers knew you in person, would they like you more or like you less?

I suppose I’d get both. It’s so easy to control what people see of you online.

11. Do you have a job?

Yes, thankfully. I work while the kids are in school. I am able to do some quick posting at work on breaks, but save the majority for home

12. If someone offered you a decent salary to keep a blog full-time without restrictions, would you do it?

Absolutely, without question, but I would tie it into other professional writing endeavors.

13. Which blog-keeper do you want to meet in real life?

That one is easy: Bunnie Diehl


15. Do you usually act like you have more money or less money than you really have?

Neither. I’m bad at faking anything. I also don’t believe that money determines lifestyle, beyond the basics. There is usually a way to get the things needed/desired without going into debt.

16. Does your family read your blog?

I sometimes print up my posts to show them.

17. How old is your blog?

About a year and a half.

18. Do you get more than 1000 page views per day? Do you care?
No. Yes and no.

19. Do you keep another secret blog in which you write about being depressed, slutty, or a liar?
Please shoot me if I ever do that…seriously. As theTerrible Swede once wrote, your blog is NOT the window to your soul!!!

20. Have you ever given another blog-keeper money for his/her writing?
No, although I would buy a book written by a blog-keeper if I were interested in reading it.

21. Do you report the money you earn from your blog on your taxes?
I don’t believe that people really make money from their blogs.

22. Is blogging narcissistic?
Anything can be narcissistic, or pietist, or self-promoting. A blog is merely an electronic sheet of paper. To attach labels to it is ridiculous. Blog-keepers will be whatever they were before they began keeping a blog.

23. Do you feel guilty when you don’t post for a long time?
No.

24. Do you like John Mayer?
Who is that? Is he that guy that sang the Daughters song? If he is, then I like that song. I don’t know if I like him.

25. Do you have enemies?
Besides myself? :) My only real enemy is Satan. Otherwise, I consider myself to be, by nature, an enemy of God, reconciled solely, by God-given faith, through the blood of Jesus Christ who continues to justify and sanctify me without regard to any action of my own.

26. Are you lonely?

Stupid question.

27. Why bother?

I hate that attitude and don’t have much patience for it.

28. Favorite Blog-keeping tip

As in every endeavor of life, do whatever you love with all your heart, do it in truth, love and with responsibility.

Only healthy and civilized news

I understand the temptation…the desire…to have only the good news on television and on the internet. The problem with “healthy and civilized” is that someone’s denifition has to be used. I’m willing to bet that plenty of things I would think are “healthy and civilized” wouldn’t be considered so in China. From an AP story out of Bejang, Audra Ang writes:

China Wants Only ‘Healthy’ News on Web

China said Sunday it is imposing new regulations to control content on its news Web sites and will allow the posting of only “healthy and civilized” news.

The move is part of China’s ongoing efforts to police the country’s 100-million Internet population. Only the United States, with 135 million users, has more.

The new rules take effect immediately and will “standardize the management of news and information” in the country, the official Xinhua News Agency said Sunday.

Be sure to read the whole article, especially this line:

Authorities in Shanghai have installed surveillance cameras and begun requiring visitors to Internet cafes to register with their official identity cards.