Entries Tagged as ''

Don’t blog unless you are watching the debates!!!

Compared to most of you, I’m an ancient old lady. To me, I was 25 just a couple of years ago. Despite my old age of 44, I am incredibly technically-savvy. I am blogging, watching several live-bloggers and listening to the debate all in one. I wonder what you 20-somethings are doing! I hope you are at least a little impressed with me.

There is a big live-blogging party in North Minneapolis, not more than 10 miles from me. Pretty cool! Good bloggers must come from Minnesota! I will try to top them by blogging on their blogging while watching the debate and blogging about that.

Minneapolis Bloggers meeting tonight include:

Good:
Powerline Blog - scoring the debate like a boxing match;
Citizen Jo -”Unfair and Unbalanced. I report, I decide. Hee, hee.”
Shot in the Dark - a blow by blow recap of the debate

Hope no one is driving home from this group:
Fraters Libertas - I thought they were blogging, but they are apparently playing a drinking game while blogging about the debate.
Our House Blog - sounds like teenagers blogging…

Other sources:
Instapundit
George Bush
John Kerry

Opener: Hey, Kerry lost his tan!

Bush’s response: He’s got it won by the second sentence. He’s natural, relaxed, experienced…

I’ll be back. Daughter is done with dance class and needs to be picked up…

Back from dance. Geez! Everyone wants to watch the Twins. They’ve already won the Central Division, come on guys! OK, husband finally agrees to watch the debate, but switches back and forth between the debate and the game.

Bush and Kerry are now complimenting each other. Too bad that can’t go on for very long. That was nice. Husband switches back to game. Twins lost to the Yankees. Yankees came from behind to win.

Just found this link. It’s the Northern Alliance Radio Network. I’ve heard of it, but never listened. Need to check it out.

Centenarians For W
We are happy to announce that Emma Torkelson from Fergus Falls, MN will be a guest on today’s NARN show. Emma is one hundred years young, her parents were Democrats, and she has NEVER voted in her long life. Before this year that is. She’s registered to vote for the first time ever and George W. Bush is her choice for President.

Bush’s public speaking ability - either you’ve got to love him or you are really bothered by his um’s and ahh’s and pauses. I am not bothered by it, but I do notice. I’ve learned through the years to pay more attention to what the person is saying.

Debate Winner: George Bush

Debate Blogging Winner: Powerline

If my kids and their homework/sports schedules allow, I will attempt a better job of live blogging the live bloggers while watching the debate.

Signing off…

This will be me in 35 or 40 years…

I’m already seeing the signs. Just two days ago my calculator disappeared from my desk, only to be found by my co-worker who pointed to it on my desk and said, “There it is, right there on your desk.”. This morning, I sat at a green light waiting for it to turn red… Just be kind to me when I drop my car off at the rental counter. Just wave as I drive through those sliding glass doors.

Finally…a quiz I can trust!

You have no idea how the Hitler/Godfather quizzes affected my psyche! This quiz is a much needed boost to my self-esteem. Everyone my age loved Audrey Hepburn. She was and still is the most beautiful and most elegant woman to walk the earth in recent times. I have tried to get my daughter to watch some of her films, but they don’t move fast enough for her. The subtle humor goes Zip! right over her head. Maybe in college? Men, please don’t take this quiz. I DO NOT want to know what type of Audrey Hepburn you are!!!

You are Princess Anne!
Buon Giorno Principessa! You’re Princess Anne from
Roman Holiday. You’re sweet and naive about
many things, but you have a strong sense of
duty. You also have an independent streak and
you love to have fun when you can. You somehow
always manage to get yourself out of trouble.

Which Audrey Hepburn Are You?
brought to you by Quizilla

Funniest story I ever read in my life…

The few of my readers who actually know me can probably figure out why I think this story is funny. I don’t know this blogger, Parableman, although I found his link through one of your links. I have no idea if his story is true, but it is pretty probable.

The reason I think this story is funny is that I was a kid like this. My brothers were just like that, I know my dad, mom and uncles were like this. Now I have kids like this and they are attracted to friends like this. What is “this”? Well, “this” special quality puts you in the wrong place at just the wrong time, gives you the inability to fake or lie (especially in your facial expressions), makes your eyes light up like fireworks when someone says, “Hey, I’ve got an idea!” and causes you to act right before you think. I could go on, but I am close to breaking my internal rule about not blogging about my kids. I think the only time I’ve broken the rule is to write about my son’s recent great idea to chuck crab-apples at cars from the woods near the credit union drive up window. I can’t even begin to think about blogging about my daughter’s exploits. Just suffice it to say that she will make one good and exciting mom and wife someday!

Nowadays, “experts” try to diagnose and medicate kids like this. We lucky ones that escaped diagnosis and medication have gone on to become very interesting adults who manage to hold down jobs, form healthy, long-lasting relationships, raise decent children and stay out of jail, unlike the predictions of the teachers and youth leaders around us. We also have made fairly good parents, because we have a pretty good idea of what our kids are thinking and doing or planning to think or do. In fact, we keep our mouths shut around our kids regarding our youthful exploits, so that we do not give them more ideas.

Introducing more confessional Lutheran bloggers…

Love and Blunder, is written by a young Lutheran couple, Devona and Rob. They are expecting a baby any day now! Lots of you probably already know Rob and Devona, but their blog is new and enjoyable to me. Here is a sample post from their blog:

Sunday, August 22, 2004
Semper fidelis, semper reformanda.

I added a bit to our blog’s sidebar this week — a few links to some of our favorite pages on the web and a description of our blog.

To explain the description: For anyone who doesn’t know, semper fidelis is Latin for “always faithful,” and semper reformanda means “always being reformed.”

Since deciding upon this description, I’ve realized that the second part might need a little clarification. I’ve found that semper reformanda has a lot of attachments to it — especially in Reformed theological circles. Devona and are not Reformed with a capital R, meaning we don’t hold five-point Calvinism to be true, etc.

Rather, I chose the phrase for two other reasons: 1) We are Lutherans, members of one denomination produced by the reformation. 2) We hope to be experiencing a personal reformation daily. We both hunger for a daily rejuvenation and revitalization of faithfulness, fed by the Word.

We’re at a pretty pivotal time in our lives. We’ve been learning how to be married, welcoming a child, entering a new church and so much more. It often feels like every day I wake up a different sort of person than the one who fell asleep. That’s got to be a good thing.

Just thought I’d explain.

The Phenomenon of Matt is written by a 22 year old college student at UW Whitewater (Wisconsin). He and Brian Braatz know each other and are on the same campus. Matt has done a better job than I did of explaining why I am a confessional lutheran christian.


Monday, September 27, 2004
God, Weather, and Music

The band performed a much better show after a much better rehearsal on Sunday morning. I was bummed about having to miss church. I thought to myself about the opinions of the students who had to do the same. I wonder if the parents cared. I wonder if religion and family life in the “real world” is much different than from what I have had. There is such a broad spectrum when it comes to how religion (for lack of a better term) plays into the modern American family. I think there are some pretty classic trends, but I am always amazed by the different stories I’ve heard about people’s encounters with “church” growing up. Here are a few that I have named and defined, totally arbitrarily…

Classic Catholic: “I don’t really know much about what our church teaches, but my [parents/mom/family] go there, so I go there every once in awhile, plus I took first communion in second grade. It makes me feel good and I generally try to live a good life and be a good person.”

Classic Contemporary Christian: “I was baptized and went with my [parents/family/mom/dad] to [insert church here] when I was little, but was always bored and hated it. I never really knew God until this one time at [insert name of youth conference/contemporary service/revival here] where God [spoke to me/brought me to my knees/slayed me in the spirit/came to me] and I committed my life to him. Before then I didn’t know God, but now I have decided to let him into my heart and now I live my life for Jesus…I was born again, and was baptized in the river, ‘cuz I know this time it really counted.”

Classic Nothing: “I never really went to church growing up. Only at Christmas and Easter with my grandparents or weddings and funerals.” or “I go to [insert church here] because that’s where our family goes. It’s boring.”

Classic Confessional: “Since I was baptized at [insert church here] and all [insert church body here] are going to heaven, I try to go to church every Sunday. Everyone else who doesn’t believe the same thing as me is going to hell and it’s my duty to convert them to my faith.”

Obviously these are all very arbitrary and exaggerated and slightly sarcastic…to prove a point. These are all kind of quotes that you may find someone saying before they hit their adolescent or “college enlightenment”. People will switch categories…a lot from classic catholic to classic contemporary Christian or classic nothing…or classic confessional to classic nothing or contemporary Christian…or they’ll stick to the original and be die-hard.

Ideally, I would not like to be identified with any of these categories that I made up. Most often others would put me in the Classic Confessional category. While it is true that I was baptized (as an infant even!) and make an earnest effort to attend church every Sunday, I do not hold that only my church body will be found in heaven (see this), nor do I possess some sort of Christian elitist attitude. I feel that it is important to let others know what God has done for us, though I hope and pray that I am not too forceful that I drive someone away. I believe that God works through his Word and sacraments, so I think it is effective to tell other people about the Bible and what God says in the Bible and what he has done for us. I do realize though, that often times people think of me and my church body as being elitist in attitude and beliefs, but all we’re really trying to do is follow the Bible as the inerrant and inspired Word of God. Now, “following the Bible” can mean a number of things. What it doesn’t mean is that we can or have to do certain things to get to heaven. What it does mean is the cross. The cross is the center to what I believe. Period.

Bush leads in several polls!

OK, I’m copying Rush Limbaugh, but I missed him talking about this yesterday.

In their introduction to the report on the poll, CNN tried to put as much spin as possible> This is funny, but sad…

Bush apparently leads Kerry in pre-debate poll
President’s approval rating highest since January
Tuesday, September 28, 2004 Posted: 12:34 PM EDT (1634 GMT)

The poll came out ahead of Thursday’s first presidential debate.

(CNN) — Headed into their first face-to-face debate, President Bush appears to be leading Democratic Sen. John Kerry among likely voters, with a clearer edge among registered voters.

Washington Post does the same this with the word “perception”.

Poll Shows Bush With Solid Lead
Despite Worries, Voters Cite Lack of Clarity From Kerry

By Dan Balz and Vanessa Williams
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, September 28, 2004; Page A01

President Bush heads into the first presidential debate with a solid lead over John F. Kerry, boosted by the perception that he is a stronger leader with a clearer vision, despite deep concerns about Iraq and the pace of the economic recovery, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News Poll and interviews with voters in battleground states.

USA Today

Bush’s lead gets smaller in poll
By Susan Page, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — President Bush leads Sen. John Kerry by 8 percentage points among likely voters, the latest USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll shows. That is a smaller advantage than the president held in mid-September but shows him maintaining a durable edge in a race that was essentially tied for months.

Have you ever secretly wished this would happen?


Sakinah Aaron was walking into the bus area at the Wheaton Metro station several weeks ago, talking loudly on her Motorola cell phone. A little too loudly for Officer George Saoutis of the Metro Transit Police.

The police officer told Aaron, who is five months pregnant, to lower her voice. She told the officer he had no right to tell her how to speak into her cell phone.

Their verbal dispute quickly escalated, and Saoutis grabbed Aaron by the arm and pushed her to the ground. He handcuffed the 23-year-old woman, called for backup and took her to a cell where she was held for three hours before being released to her aunt. She was charged with two misdemeanors: “disorderly manner that disturbed the public peace” and resisting arrest.

Ok, maybe it is going too far for the police to ARREST someone talking loudly in public on a cell phone. It seems like I see this kind of oblivious behavior more often. It is usually a woman, talking so loudly that everyone around her has stopped in their tracks to try to understand why she is shouting. I think our society is becoming more and more detached from each other.

On a strange and funnier note, I observed a woman talking loudly on her cell phone, oblivious to others, last year at….a church Christmas program at our lutheran day school!!! The pastor was up front and it was quite obvious to everyone else that this was a real worship service and not just a cute little kids concert. But this woman just jabbered on and on during the service. Finally, a man was brave enough to get up from his seat and walk over to her to ask her to take her conversation out in the hall. That’s my funniest cell phone story. What’s yours?

Confessional Lutheran Fellowship Update

Update:

One brave commenter wrote: .

“Be nice to me; I am trying to understand why the confessional churches in the LCMS still think that those who have left the confessional fold will ever return.”

As a confessional Lutheran in the LCMS camp, I must say I enjoy reading your blog from time to time. Let me simply point out, in view of your above statement, there is a certain ironic ring to it. Not to unsettle your conviction as a member of the WELS but Article V of the Augsburg confession and, most especially, Article XIII of Apology provide another perspective on who has left whose “confessional fold.”

Not that I am endorsing in any way the LCMS’s current shenanigans or the ELCA’s state of institutional apostasy.

Just trying to point out that things aren’t nearly so ‘cut and dry’ as synodical informational web sites try to make them. I honestly doubt whether a purely faithful expression of The Book of Concord truly exists in institutional form.

Keep up the good work on your excellent blog.

– A LCMS-er

My response:

Actually, I am not a member of the WELS. In fact, I often find their viewpoints more harsh than the ELS, which is the synod that found me, although technically we are in church fellowship. I am new and am still learning. I will research those articles to understand what they say and why you think they apply to my question.

Here is Article V of the Augsburg Confession. Hopefully someone can explain why anonymous mentions this article in relation to my question.

Article V: Of the Ministry.

That we may obtain this faith, the Ministry of Teaching the Gospel and administering the Sacraments was instituted. For through the Word and Sacraments, as through instruments, the Holy Ghost is given, who works faith; where and when it pleases God, in them that hear the Gospel, to wit, that God, not for our own merits, but for Christ’s sake, justifies those who believe that they are received into grace for Christ’s sake.

They condemn the Anabaptists and others who think that the Holy Ghost comes to men without the external Word, through their own preparations and works.

As far as Article XIII, I did locate it on the internet and it is a long and wordy document. Gee, I think I will have to defer to more knowledgeable people until I can study it in more depth.

Based on anonymous’ comments and my reading of the two articles, I’m getting the impression that there is animosity on the part of the LCMS toward the WELS (and the ELS?). Is this correct? As a new ELS member and a new “member” of this informal circle of confessional lutheran blogs, I am trying to learn more about this. It has been my experience that these issues aren’t discussed in my church, but some older members make reference to them in casual conversations. So you are the ones with the opportunity to enlighten me on the conservative LCMS point of view. What do you want me to know?

Second question: In regards to the dissolution of the synodical conference in 1967, does the past matter anymore? Do new confessional lutherans have to “understand” why confessional lutherans of the past disagreed, even if the existing ones now agree?

Based on lack of response, fellowship among confessional lutherans has been cancelled.

Frustrated with a lack of response from my fellow lutherans, I took this post down last night. After sleeping on it, I decided to put it back up. Hopefully, it will eventually get the responses I desire from other confessional lutherans. If not, it will stand as a question mark to why we don’t have fellowship. My question remains: Will the confessional lutheran synodical conference, in a new form, return in my lifetime? If you don’t know what I’m talking about, read here.

Fellowship amongst confessional lutherans

I have written before about how, as a new confessional lutheran, it was/still is hard to understand the history of the confessional lutheran synods and why some are no longer in fellowship (for the time being). My fellow confessional lutheran bloggers don’t seem to differ from me in doctrine and we have great and interesting discussions. Yet once in a while it occurs to me that our churches (LCMS and ELS) are not in church fellowship. When I ask older members of my church, they often mention LCMS family members, past membership in the LCMS, etc. A few have even spoke of the split from the LCMS with great pain and I sense that it drove a wedge in some families. This pain has also been expressed often on the WELS Q&A website. Some Christians don’t understand the importance of examining one’s personal and corporate doctrines; I used to be one of those people. I do understand now. This post is meant to ask LCMS confessional lutherans if they think a split will happen and the confessional lutheran synodical conference (I think that it what it was called) will ever return.

I spoke to a couple of knowledgeable ELS people the other day about my blogging experience with LCMS confessional lutherans. They told me that the LCMS is basically split in two groups: one confessional group and the other group very close to the ELCA in beliefs (or lack of). They predicted that a split would occur. I naively asked if the confessional group would join the WELS or ELS and I got a laugh as a response. Apparently the LCMS is a little too large to join one of our tiny synods and would just form their own new synod. At that point, talks could begin to discuss fellowship between the WELS, ELS and new synod. I pray for that day and hope to see it in my lifetime.

Of course, I’ve read “What’s Going on Among the Lutherans”. It was helpful in understanding the past. The WELS Q&A website also has lots of posts about this issue. This question was recently asked and the responder took a more negative, yet still hopeful view of a potential split. I am wondering what my fellow confessional lutherans think about the WELS response to this question. In my experience, the WELS tends to sound more negative and conservative, yet they are the ones welcoming the travesty of contemporary worship into some churches to appease the spiritually-immature whiners asking for candy instead of a meal. I only mention that because it seems to me to be an inconsistency. Why so negative toward the potential for a split and yet so welcoming of Reformed and Baptist practices?

Be nice to me; I am trying to understand why the confessional churches in the LCMS still think that those who have left the confessional fold will ever return. If the ELCA is a previous example, poor though it may be, then reform is not likely. While an actually split would be physically very difficult, I don’t understand why it isn’t happening.